Drowning Out Rumor: Dynamical Models of the Interaction between Spreaders of and Exposed to Truth and Rumor Spreading
Juan Miguel Augusto M. Feria1,3§,, Michael Lawrence S. Oliva1§,
Briane Paul V. Samson2,3,4, and Angelyn R. Lao1,3*
1Mathematics and Statistics Department, De La Salle University, Manila, Metro Manila 1004 Philippines
2Software Technology Department, De La Salle University, Manila, Metro Manila 1004 Philippines
3Center for Complexity and Emerging Technologies, De La Salle University,
Manila, Metro Manila 1004 Philippines
4Graduate School of Systems Information Science, Future University Hakodate,
Hakodate, Hokkaido 0418655 Japan
§Both authors contributed equally to this work
Social networking sites have become instrumental in spreading information online, which unfortunately includes rumors and misinformation. Past studies have investigated the spread of rumors without considering that truth may spread simultaneously. This study considers both the spread of truth and rumor and investigates the result of their coexistence in a population. We formulated the spreader-spreader interaction model and the exposed-spreader interaction model based on the epidemiological SEIR model. In the spreader-spreader interaction model, the spreaders try to influence the opposing spreaders whereas, in the exposed-spreader interaction model, the spreaders try to influence the exposed individuals from the opposing side. In our study, we calculated the reproduction numbers for truth and rumor, determined the stability of the model at the equilibrium points, and determined an approach for spreading truth while halting rumors. In the spreader-spreader model, we have shown that increasing the removal rate of Spreaders of Rumor decreases the prevalence of rumor in the population. Whereas in the exposed-spreader model, we showed that increasing the conversion rate of Exposed to Rumor to Exposed to Truth significantly increases the amount of Exposed to Truth in the population, thereby making it an effective mechanism for promoting the spread of truth. In conclusion, it is harder to control the information epidemic in the exposed-spreader model but, compared to the spreader-spreader model, information spreads faster according to the exposed-spreader model. For certain information to be endemic to a population, our study proposes that spreaders take advantage during the first few days of the information diffusion process.
Social networking sites are online platforms that connect us with our real-life friends in the digital realm. As technology progressed, entities like brands, news outlets, and people have utilized and transformed these social networking sites as platforms to spread influences, promote products, and increase audiences (Kandhway and Kuri 2014, Rodrigues 2016). While this phenomenon has benefited both influence-seekers for increased reach and the masses for serendipitous encounters of new information, this has also brought about negative externalities to our societies. One of which is the deliberate spread and amplification of misinformation and rumors, enabled by previously unknown accounts that are emerging and claiming ascendancy over established information sources (Del Vicario et al. 2016). Considering their evident societal impact, it is vital for us to understand how information spreads within these platforms and how to control it. . . . read more
ANDREWS C, FICHET E, DING Y, SPIRO ES, STARBIRD K. 2016. Keeping Up with the Tweet-dashians: The Impact of ‘Official’ Accounts on Online Rumoring. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing; 2016 Feb 27 – Mar 02; San Francisco, CA, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. p. 452–465.
DEL VICARIO M, BESSI A, ZOLLO F, PETRONI F, SCALA A, CALDARELLI G, STANLEY G, QUATTROCIOCCHI W. 2016. The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 554–559.
HU Y, PAN Q, HOU W, HE M. 2018. Rumor spreading model with the different attitudes towards rumors. Physica A 502: 331–344.
KANDHWAY K, KURI J. 2014. How to run a campaign: Optimal control of SIS and SIR information epidemics. Applied Mathematics and Computation 231: 79–92
KEELING M, ROHANI P. 2008. Modeling Infections Disease in Humans and Animals. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 408p.
LIU X, LI T, TIAN M. 2018a. Rumor spreading of a SEIR model in complex social networks with hesitating mechanism. Advances in Difference Equations 1(391).
LIU Y, ZENG C, LUO Y. 2018b. Dynamics of a new rumor propagation model with the spread of truth. Applied Mathematics 9: 536–549.
MADDOCK J, STARBIRD K, AL-HASSINI HJ, SANDOVAL DE, ORAND M, MASOON RM. 2015. Characterizing online rumoring behavior using multi-dimensional signatures. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing; 2015 Mar 14–18; Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery. p. 228–241.
RODRIGUES HS. 2016. Application of SIR epidemiological model: new trends. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Informatics 10: 92–97.
SPIRO ES, FITZHUGH S, SUTTON J, PIERSKI N, GRECZEK M, BUTTS CT. 2012. Rumoring during extreme events: A case study of deepwater horizon 2010. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference; 2012 Jun 22–24; Evanston, IL, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. p. 275–283.
STARBIRD K. 2017. Examining the alternative media ecosystem through the production of alternative narratives of mass shooting events on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media; 2017 May 15–18; Montreal, QC, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. p. 230–239.
STEWART LG, ARIF A, NIED AC, SPIRO ES, STARBIRD K. 2017. Drawing the lines of contention: Networked frame contests within #blacklivesmatter discourse. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1(96).
WANG T, HE J, WANG X. 2018. An information spreading model based on online social networks. Physica A 490: 488–496.