Forensic DNA Analysis in Criminal Investigations
Maria Corazon A. de Ungria
DNA Analysis Laboratory, Natural Sciences Research Institute
University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines
corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ABSTRACT
DNA analysis is a most powerful tool for human identification and has clear forensic applications in identity testing (crime scene and mass disaster investigations) and parentage determination. The development of forensic DNA technology in other countries and its potential to improve the Philippine criminal justice system are briefly discussed. The utility of forensic DNA testing in criminal investigations was highlighted using an actual criminal case wherein DNA evidence played a clear role in the resolution of the case.
INTRODUCTION
Owing to the efficacy of forensic DNA analysis in human identification, the application of modern DNA technology has played a crucial role in identify testing (crime scene investigations, mass disaster and parentage testing
This paper reviews the basic background of the science behind forensic DNA analysis and presents its utility in criminal cases, with particular focus on the use of STR methods in sexual assault cases in the Philippines. . . . . . .
REFERENCES
ASPLEN CH. 1999. From crime scene to court room: integrating DNA technology into the criminal justice system. Judicature 83(3): 144-149.
AYRES KL, CHASELING J, BALDING DJ. 2002. Implications for DNA identification arising from an analysis of Australian forensic databases. Forensic Sci Int 129: 90-98.
BAN JD. 2001. Operating and managing a statewide DNA program. Croat Med J 42(3): 281-284.
BRENNER C. 1993. A note on paternity computation in cases lacking a mother. Transfusion 33(1): 51-54.
BUDOWLE B, CHAKRABORTY R, CARMODY G, MONSON KL. 2002. Source attribution of a forensic DNA profile. Forensic Sci Communic 2: 1-5.
BUTLER JM. 2001. Forensic DNA Typing: Biology and Technology Behind STR Markers. San Diego: Academic Press; 322p.
CHAKRABORTY R, SLIVERS DN. 1996. Paternity exclusion by DNA markers: effects of paternal mutations. J Forensic Sci 41(4): 671-677.
CORACH D, SALA A, PENACINO G, SOTELO A. 1998. Mass disasters: rapid molecular screening of human remains by means of short tandem repeats typing. Electrophoresis 16: 1617-23.
CROUSE CA, SCHUMM J. 1995. Investigation of species specificity using nine PCR-based human STR systems. J Forensic Sci 40(6): 952-956.
DE UNGRIA MCA, CALACAL GC, MAGNO MMF, DELFIN FC, TABBADA KA, FRANI AM. 2001. DNA evidence in Philippine courts: a case report. Philippine Law Gazette 13(3): 46-49.
DE UNGRIA MCA, FRANIAM, MAGNO MMF, TABBADA KA, CALACAL GC, DELFIN FC, HALOS SC. 2002. Evaluating DNA tests of motherless cases using a Philippine genetic database. Transfusion 42: 954-957.
EVEN IW, WEIR BS. 1998. Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates Inc. 278p.
FRANKLIN-BARBAJOSA C. 1992. DNA profiling: the new science of identity. National Geographic 181(5): 112-123.
FURBISH LK. 1997. Paternity establishment law in 1988 and today. http:www/ojp/usdoj.gov/nij/
GILL P, EVEN I. 1995. Population genetics of short tandem repeat (STR) loci. Genetica 96: 69-87.
HONDA K, ROEWER L, DE KNIJFF P. 1999. Male DNA typing from 25-year old vaginal swabs using Y chromosomal STR polymorphisms in a retrial request case. J Forensic Sci 44(4): 868-872.
HOU Y, SONG Z, WU J, ZHANG J. 2000. How many STR markers are enough for paternity identification? Prog Forensic Genetics 8: 384-386.
JEFFREYS AJ, WILSON AV, THEIN SL. 1985. Individual-specific 'fingerprints; of human DNA. Nature 316: 76-79.
MUKAIDA M, KIMURA H, TAKADA Y, MASUDA T, NAKATA Y. 2000. The personal identification of many samples recovered from under the sea. Forensic Sci Int 113: 79-85.
SCHNEIDER PM, MARTIN PD. 2001. Criminal DNA databases: the European situation. Forensic Sci Int 119: 232-238.
TRAVIS J, ASPLEN C. 1999. Postconviction DNA testing: recommendations for handling requests. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Justice. 118p.
WEIR BS. 1996. Genetic Data Analysis II: Method of discrete population genetic data. Sunderland, Massachussets: Sinauer Associates Inc. 445p.
WHITAKER JP, CLAYTON TM, URQUHART AJ, MILLICAN ES, DOWNES TJ, KIMPTON CP, GILL P. 1995. Short tandem repeat typing of bodies from a mass disaster: high success rate and characteristic amplification pattems in highly degraded samples. BioTechniques 18(4): 670-677.
WORD CJ, SAWOSIK TM, BING DH. 1997. Summary of validation studies from twenty six forensic laboratories in the United States and Canada on the use of the Amplitype PM PCR amplification and typing kit. J Forensic Sci 42(1): 39-48.
